Taking too long? Close loading screen.
Connect with us

World

Stephen Miller, explained

Published

on

How much do we really know about Stephen Miller?

A senior adviser to President Donald Trump, the 35-year-old Miller has emerged as the leading far-right ideologue in this administration — outlasting his only real competitor, Steve Bannon. By all accounts, Miller is the driving force behind Trump’s most extreme anti-immigration measures — from the separation of migrant families at the border to Trump’s infamous “Muslim ban.” Now he’s in the news for an entirely different reason: On Tuesday, he was the latest top Trump aide to test positive for coronavirus.

As my Vox colleague Jane Coaston pointed out, Miller delights in provocation for provocation’s sake. And yet, in this role, he has gone beyond “triggering the libs” to shepherding real policies with real consequences. He’s also been enormously successful at reinforcing his power in one of the most chaotic White Houses we’ve ever seen.

A new book called Hatemonger by journalist Jean Guerrero takes a deep dive into Miller’s background — where he comes from, the events and people that shaped his worldview, and what he really wants. It’s a fascinating look at Miller’s upbringing in southern California and the Trump-like family dynamics that turned him into a conservative firebrand.

Miller’s ambitions are all the more important in light of recent comments from a former Trump DHS official suggesting Miller has a list of “shock and awe” immigration orders to unleash if Trump wins a second term, orders that “were unacceptable to issue in a first presidential term because they knew they would lose voters because they would be so extreme.”

I reached out to Guerrero to talk about Miller’s life and ideology and, hopefully, get a sense of what those “extreme” orders might look like. Miller, Guerrero argues, might be a troll, but he’s also much more than that — and we dismiss him at our own peril.

A lightly edited transcript of our conversation follows.

Sean Illing

The premise of your book is that we should take Stephen Miller seriously because he’s someone who genuinely thinks he’s on a “quest to save the country.” What does that mean?

Jean Guerrero

It means he’s a fanatic. I really believe that Stephen Miller is one of the few people in the White House who has a firm ideology and has invested in that ideology over the course of his life so much that it’s become inseparable from his identity. And that ideology is basically that multiculturalism poses an existential threat to Western civilization, as we know it.

So his entire obsession with the immigration system and trying to limit the number of people from different countries, particularly from Latin America and Africa, to come here, it goes back to that belief that multiculturalism is a threat to civilization, which is a prominent view among white supremacist groups and it’s why they want a white majority in this country.

These are ideas that Miller learned at a very young age and over the years invested more and more in them. My sense, based on the conversations I had with people who have known him since he was a kid, is that this has become his life’s mission and it drives everything he does now that he has real power.

Sean Illing

It’s a little surprising to hear you say that Miller has a “firm ideology” because he built his reputation as a troll, and we don’t typically think of trolls as serious ideologues.

Jean Guerrero

His friends tell me that, at first, they also couldn’t tell whether he was joking, And maybe early on in his life, it was less about ideology and more about being a teenager and looking for attention and finding ways to stand out and wanting to make certain people laugh. But over the years, he learned that being provocative was a good way to get attention and power and so that become a key political tool for him.

So yeah, I do think Miller started out as a kind of troll but eventually the ideas he was flirting with became a huge part of his identity and he really believed it. This sense of mission he has is inseparable from his identity, he’s consumed by it. Whatever lightheartedness he may have had when he was younger is gone — we should see him above all as a committed ideologue.

Sean Illing

I always wonder with these alt-right types if they began as trolls and picked up a coherent ideology later or if it’s the other way around. I guess it’s the former in Miller’s case, but also a little complicated because there was real resentment pretty early on in Miller’s life.

Jean Guerrero

Even though I said he may have started out as a troll, it’s misleading to think of his early years that way. As you said, there was a lot of actual resentment present in his early years, particularly towards students of color, and the trolling was often a mask for that resentment.

Sean Illing

Where did that resentment come from?

Jean Guerrero

He started to express his conservative and contrarian views at a time when his family had lost a lot of money, and he had to move from a very affluent part of Santa Monica to a less affluent part. And he looked around at his high school, his very diverse public high school, where otherwise he might’ve attended a mostly white private high school and he was clearly annoyed that so many of his class were getting special attention and having their voices elevated. And this is when he starts to express his resentments out loud. He becomes more vocal and more aggressive.

Sean Illing

When I look at some of these clips of Miller, especially when he was younger, it’s so hard tell where the trolling ends and the earnest beliefs begin. Everything he says is tinged by that half-cocked grin, and you can see it still today. Is it just impossible to disentangle the performance from the ideology in Miller’s case?

Jean Guerrero

I think they’re impossible to disentangle, partly because he takes such pleasure in triggering people. When he goes on television or gives interviews, he sometimes has this glimmer in his eye and will say things that are kind of humorous but it’s never totally clear if it’s a joke. But what he’s really doing is trying to expose what he thinks is the false moral outrage of a lot of progressives — this is his thing. So yeah, it’s trolling but it’s also a way of advancing his ideology because he believes trolling is an effective way to do politics.

Sean Illing

There are a lot of bizarre anecdotes in the book, but the one about Miller and the high janitors is so revealing. Can you explain briefly what that’s about?

Jean Guerrero

He gave this speech at his high school where he was screaming, “Why do we have to pick up our trash when we have janitors to do it for us.” And I remember reading his friend, Chris Morris’s justification of it. “Oh, it was a joke. Obviously, it was a joke. It was just meant to get people to laugh.”

One of the questions I wanted to answer was, how much of a joke was it really? I went back and interviewed a lot of his classmates and former friends and I don’t think it was a joke. There were numerous instances, not just in high school but also in college, where he would throw his trash or leave his trash out and encourage others to do the same, saying, “This is what we have the janitors here to do.” And at one point, he told a teacher who was encouraging students at a rally to clean up after themselves, he interrupted her and said, “No, don’t listen to her. This is what we have janitors here to do. They need a job. So throw your trash on the ground.”

It struck a lot of classmates as not only classist but racist. At Miller’s high school, there were a handful of janitors for this very large student population, and they were mostly people of color. So giving that speech the way he gave it made a lot of classmates feel like he was trying to incite a race riot at the school and that’s why they had to push him off the stage, because he wouldn’t stop talking and the student body was getting really riled up.

Sean Illing

So what do you think he’s doing in the White House? Does he really want to change the world or is the White House the ultimate trolling platform?

Jean Guerrero

It’s an interesting question. Nothing in any of my discussions with his colleagues in the White House have indicated that he has looked to influence other countries consciously. I do think that it would be a natural next step for Miller to try to spread his ideology overseas and coordinate with others and share his views in other countries, and try to turn that into some kind of global movement, as we saw Steve Bannon attempting to do.

I think Miller would be more effective and more dangerous than Bannon by the way, because I don’t think that Bannon has a real ideology the way that Stephen Miller does. So far, he’s been extremely focused on the United States. He has an almost tunnel vision for immigration policies in the US and that’s what he’s focused on. But I wouldn’t be surprised he expanded his focus outward in the future.

Sean Illing

What would you say is the most important thing people should know about Miller?

Jean Guerrero

I think people should know that he is arguably the most powerful advisor in the White House. And he is a case study in radicalization, someone who was consumed by an extreme ideology at a very young age, and then went on to become one of the most powerful advisers in the White House, shaping not only immigration policy, but Trump’s speeches and even the reelection strategy for 2020.

Sean Illing

Why is Miller the one adviser, apart from Trump’s family members, that has survived all these years?

Jean Guerrero

It’s a few things. The most important is that Miller gets Trump — emotionally, psychologically, even spiritually. Part of it is that Miller grew up in a family that was very similar to Donald Trump’s. Several people described Miller’s father to me as “Trump-like.” He was tangled up in numerous legal disputes and bankruptcies related to his real estate company over the years, as Miller was growing up. He is described in court documents as being a master of evasion and manipulation. He was described to me as being very combative. I think this experience helps Miller manage his relationship with Trump, helps him manage Trump’s personality.

The other part of it is that Miller is always tasks himself as a devoted vehicle for Trump’s agenda and is careful not to overshadow his boss. And this is partly one of the sources of his power within the White House. Whenever he wants something done, he invokes Trump. He invokes Trump’s desires, Trump’s demands. He invokes Trump’s name. So he’s constantly channeling Trump and this makes officials in the White House afraid to challenge him, because it’s like they would be challenging the president. And they’re aware of his special relationship with the president.

So this elevates Miller’s power within the bureaucracy, but it also elevates his power over Trump personally, because it works for Trump’s ego, unlike other people who have exaggerated their influence in the White House. Miller is more comfortable in Trump’s shadow.

Sean Illing

What do you think Miller does after Trump? Does he find another political vehicle or is he likely to get involved some other way?

Jean Guerrero

His initial goal was to be a prosecutor and then become a senator. I think becoming a prosecutor is not on his mind anymore, but I do think it’s possible that he might still run for office somewhere. I think it’s possible he might try and make a living as a commentator on conservative outlets.

I do think that if Donald Trump loses the election, Miller will double down on his ideology and look for new ways to elevate it through the media, something he’s very good at doing. He understands the media and has been exploiting it since he was a teenager going on conservative talk radio in southern California. And if Trump wins in November, well, I think he’s going to double down on his agenda and become even more powerful.


Help keep Vox free for all

Millions turn to Vox each month to understand what’s happening in the news, from the coronavirus crisis to a racial reckoning to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world: Contribute today from as little as $3.

Source

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Trump casts vote ahead of campaign blitz in battleground states

Published

on

Donald Trump will hold rallies in three key swing states on Saturday, while Joe Biden is campaigning in Pennsylvania.

Donald Trump has joined more than 56 million people across the United States to cast their ballots early, as the US president voted on Saturday morning in Florida before beginning a day of rallies in key battleground states.

The president’s campaign blitz 10 days before November 3, reminiscent of his state-hopping in the final stretch of the 2016 election, comes just a day after the United States recorded a new single-day record of COVID-19 infections.

The president wore a mask when he voted, but took it off when speaking to reporters. Several hundred supporters gathered with flags and signs outside the library where he voted, chanting: “Four more years.”

“It was a very secure vote, much more secure than when you send in a ballot,” Trump told reporters after voting in West Palm Beach, repeating unfounded allegations that mail-in voting is more susceptible to fraud.

“I voted for a guy named Trump,” he added.

Lagging in national polls and with what analysts consider a narrow path to victory in the Electoral College, Trump has been trying to recreate the enthusiasm he harnessed in the final days of the 2016 campaign.

On Saturday, he will first hold a rally in North Carolina, before travelling to Ohio and Wisconsin, all states considered important for victory, but where COVID-19 cases have spiked and in-person rallies may be a political liability.

Biden in Pennsylvania

Trump’s Democratic challenger, Joe Biden, who has made his cautious approach to campaigning during the pandemic central to his messaging, will hold two events on Saturday, both socially distanced “drive-in rallies”.

The first event will be in Bucks County, north of Philadelphia, and the second will be in Luzerne County, near Biden’s birthplace of Scranton, Pennsylvania, and an area once considered a Democratic stronghold that Trump won in 2016.

President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden, faced off in the final presidential debate on Thursday [File: Jim Bourg/AP]

Polls show Biden narrowly leading Trump in the state, which is considered crucial to both candidates.

A Reuters/Ipsos poll released earlier this week showed Biden with a 4-percentage-point advantage on Trump in the state, down from seven points the week before.

Biden cast his ballot weeks ago in Delaware.

On Thursday, 12 days before the election, early voting surpassed the total number of early votes cast in 2016.

As of Saturday, the number of people who had cast their ballots early – either by mail or in-person – was more than 40 percent of all the votes cast in 2016.

Source

Continue Reading

World

Children killed in attack on Cameroonian school

Published

on

Assailants storm private school in city of Kumba, Southwest Region, killing at least four students.

Attackers have opened fire on a private school in Cameroon’s Southwest Region, killing at least four children, according to officials.

The unknown assailants stormed the Mother Francisca School in the city of Kumba on Saturday. There was no immediate claim of responsibility.

“They attacked around noon. They found the children in a class and they opened fire on them,” Kumba sub-prefect Ali Anougou told the Reuters news agency.

At least nine other students were wounded and sent to the hospital. There were fears the death toll could rise.

The Associated Press news agency quoted Anougou as blaming separatists who have been fighting the military in parts of western Cameroon for the attack.

Cameroon’s two Anglophone regions – the Northwest and Southwest Regions – are home to a large minority of English speakers in a country where French speakers are the overwhelming majority – a situation that is the legacy of the decolonisation of western Africa by France and Britain more than 60 years ago.

In late 2016, long-standing complaints of political and economic discrimination against English speakers by the central government spilled over when lawyers, students and teachers began calling for reforms.

The government’s lethal response to the protests provoked rebels to declare in 2017 independence for a region they call “Ambazonia”, triggering a stronger crackdown by the authorities.

Both sides have since been accused of committing atrocities in a conflict that has killed some 3,000 people and forced hundreds of thousands of people from their homes.

Anglophone secessionists have imposed curfews and closed schools as part of their protest against President Paul Biya’s government.

Last year, officials blamed separatists for kidnapping dozens of schoolchildren, charges the separatists denied.

Source

Continue Reading

World

Deadly suicide bombing hits Kabul educational centre

Published

on

At least 18 people killed and 57 wounded in blast at educational centre in an area home to many from the Shia community.

At least 18 people were killed and dozens were wounded in a suicide bombing at an educational centre in Kabul, Afghanistan’s interior ministry said.

The explosion struck outside the Kawsar-e Danish educational centre in the Pul-e-Khoshk area of Dasht-e-Barchi in west Kabul.

The interior ministry spokesman Tariq Arian said the attacker was trying to enter the centre when he was stopped by security guards and detonated his explosives.

Arian said the attack had left at least 18 people dead and 57 wounded.

The attack happened in an area that is home to many from the minority Shia community. The ISIL (ISIS) armed group has launched several attacks in Afghanistan on the Shia community, whom it views as apostates.

In the same area of Kabul, dozens of students died in an attack on another educational centre in 2018, and in May, gunmen attacked a maternity ward, killing 24 people, including mothers and babies.

The Taliban denied responsibility for the latest attack, which came at a sensitive time as representatives of the armed group and government meet in Qatar to seek a peace deal – even as violence has risen recently and the United States intends to withdraw its remaining troops from the country.

Surge in violence

The US signed a peace deal with the Taliban in February, opening up a path towards withdrawing American troops from the conflict.

US officials said the deal would also help refocus security efforts on fighting ISIL, which is a rival of the Taliban in Afghanistan.

There has been a surge in violence between Taliban and Afghan forces in the country recently, even as representatives from the two warring sides have begun peace talks in Doha to end the decades-long war in Afghanistan.

Earlier on Saturday, a roadside bomb killed nine people in eastern Afghanistan after it struck a minivan full of civilians, a local official said.

Ghazni province police spokesman Ahmad Khan Sirat said a second roadside bomb had killed two policemen after it struck their vehicle which was making its way to the victims of the first explosion.

Sirat added the bombings had wounded several others, and the attacks were under investigation.

No one immediately claimed responsibility for the attacks. The provincial police spokesman claimed the Taliban had placed the bomb.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending