Taking too long? Close loading screen.
Connect with us


Inside the turbulent journey to Ortega vs. Chan Sung Jung



Angela Hill was sitting in the second row at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas on March 7 as Joanna Jedrzejczyk was walking out to challenge women’s strawweight champion Zhang Weili in the co-main event of UFC 248.

Out of the corner of her eye, Hill saw UFC featherweight Brian Ortega coming toward the area where she was seated with her husband, Adam Blair Pryde, who was on her left.

“I’ve seen him a few times in person,” Hill said. “So I did one of those embarrassing things where I thought he was coming over to me. I was like, ‘Hey.’ But he wasn’t coming over to me.”

No, Ortega was looking past Hill, to the man sitting to her right. Ortega asked the man if he was Jay Park, the Korean pop star who is also the co-manager — and sometimes interpreter — for Ortega’s rival Chan Sung Jung, aka “Korean Zombie.”

Park said he was, and as Park got up, Ortega slapped him across the face with his right hand.

“It was really loud,” Hill said. “He just smacked the s— out of him.”

Park stumbled, but then tried to lunge toward Ortega. Hill held Park back, while Blair Pryde attempted to restrain Ortega. UFC and arena security were quickly on the scene. As he was being pulled away, Ortega could be heard in a video published on TMZ saying in the direction of Park: “I told you I’d slap you like a b—-.”

It was the first — and so far only — physical salvo in one of the most extraordinary rivalries in the UFC, a feud that has spanned more than a year. It has included social media smack talk, an endearing cultural gesture, an injury withdrawal and the open-handed slap of a non-fighter.

The one thing it hasn’t included? An actual fight between Ortega and Jung. That will change Saturday night in the main event of UFC Fight Night in Abu Dhabi. Ortega and Jung are two of the best and most exciting featherweight fighters in the world. When they clash on “Fight Island,” the winner will land a title shot against champion Alexander Volkanovski, according to UFC president Dana White.

“If Zombie still has negative feelings for what Brian did — which he has a right to do — it [ means] more to him than [just a sport],” said Ortega’s longtime Brazilian jiu-jitsu coach, Rener Gracie. “If Brian, even though he squashed it, still feels like the disrespect that was thrown his way warrants a response, then it’s more than the sport. That’s kind of up to them. That’s what the world has to wait to find out.”

Jung knocked out Renato Moicano with a bomb of a right hand in just 58 seconds on June 22, 2019. The talk of a potential fight between Ortega and Jung started heating up thereafter. The matchup made sense as both men were jockeying for position near the top of the featherweight rankings.

On the day of Jung’s knockout win, Ortega posted on Instagram, “September ready,” indicating when he would be ready to return from injuries he suffered in a title loss to Max Holloway seven months earlier. On July 15, 2019, Jung responded with “Me too,” adding the flags of South Korea and Mexico (Ortega is Mexican American). Four days later, Jung posted an edited side-by-side shot of himself and Ortega with the caption “What are you doing?” and the hashtag #answerme. Park, who has more than 4 million Instagram followers, commented on the post and tagged Ortega. “im a fan but my guy is calling you out!!” Park wrote.

Ortega fired back on July 24, 2019, referencing Jung’s KO losses: “I’m the real zombie. I don’t go down with head shots.”

On Aug. 2, 2019, Jung posted a Photoshopped image of himself as a zombie on Instagram with the caption: “Are you still scared of me ??” and the hashtag #chicken.

In an interview with MMAFighting.com on Aug. 22, 2019, Ortega questioned Jung’s trash talk and where it was coming from. Jung had not been known for aggressive posts like that.

“I want to give the fans a main event fight somewhere,” Ortega said. “‘Korean Zombie’ sounds good, especially after the fact that he’s talking s—, which is not like him, so I’m guessing there’s something behind that.”

On Sept. 23, 2019, Ortega vs. Zombie was finally booked for Dec. 21 in Busan, South Korea. Ortega posted on Instagram: “Who’s scared? I’m coming to you.”

Ortega flew to Seoul, South Korea, for a media tour to promote the UFC Busan main event on Oct. 14, 2019. While waiting for the news conference to begin, Ortega was approached by one of Jung’s interpreters. The interpreter said Jung wanted to apologize for the social media posts. Ortega said Jung should come over and say it himself, which he did. Ortega accepted. The hatchet — for the time being — was buried.

“If a grown-ass man comes up to you, says sorry and shakes your hand, that takes a lot from where I come from,” Ortega told ESPN recently. “I take that respect and said, ‘All right.’ Brush it under the rug and don’t worry about it.”

That day, Ortega said he also asked a member of Jung’s team what had spurred the recent trash talk. Ortega said he was told that it wasn’t Jung but Park, who manages Jung in South Korea. Ortega made a mental note of that. But Jung apologized, and that was good enough for Ortega.

In fact, Ortega wasn’t content with just positive words during the news conference. After the two did their traditional staredown after the presser, Ortega made a gesture, putting his index finger and thumb together and held it up to Jung. The gesture is called a “finger heart” and is popular in South Korea as a sign of endearment.

“There’s no need to hype up the fight in a negative way,” Ortega said. “The Korean heart and the love, the respect — the whole world saw that Korean heart — that’s the way I wanted it to be. That’s why I did it that way. I said, ‘Let’s make this funny, let’s make this real, let’s make this respectable.’ Let’s have fun in there.”

Jung was clearly stunned by the gesture. He put his face in his hands and patted Ortega on his shoulder. The two put their arms around each other’s shoulders and took photos for the media in attendance.

“We were on good terms,” Jung recently told ESPN through an interpreter. “He had good manners — the heart sign he gave. I had no animosity for him. … That’s a Korean thing that a lot of Americans don’t know, the heart sign with the fingers. I thought it was cute.”

The fight fell apart on Dec. 4. Ortega was forced to withdraw with a partial ACL tear. The news was a huge blow to Ortega, who had spent almost all of 2019 healing from injuries. Ortega had not fought since a fourth-round TKO (doctor’s stoppage) loss — the first of his career — to Holloway in a featherweight title fight at UFC 231 on Dec. 8, 2018.

“It was like, we’re finally here,” Ortega said. “Like this took way too f—ing long [to come back]. And then right before the fight another injury happened. Story of my f—ing life. Really? This had to happen?”

Former UFC lightweight champion Frankie Edgar, a man Ortega had already knocked out, filled in against Jung. It didn’t last long. “Zombie” finished Edgar at 3:18 of the first round via TKO.

With two straight first-round finishes, the surging Jung turned his attention to either Volkanovski, who was the current champ, or Holloway, the former champ. In an interview on Ariel Helwani’s MMA Show on Feb. 10, Jung said he no longer had much interest in fighting Ortega.

“Ortega already ducked me one time,” Jung said via translation from Park. “I don’t need to fight a fighter that’s ducking me.”

That set Ortega off. He was frustrated by his injury and did not appreciate Jung — even assuming Park was the instigator — going back to trash talk after the two mended fences in Seoul. In the comments on the interview clip posted to the ESPN MMA Instagram account, Ortega commented: “Jay Park welcome to the fight game don’t be surprised if I slap the s— out of you when I see you.”

Ortega said Jung already had someone interpreting for him on the Helwani Show, Korean American Jung coach Eddie Cha. Ortega felt that Park’s role was to be an antagonist, and that ticked him off. With Park being one of Jung’s managers, along with Jason House in the United States, Ortega believed Park was trying to create some buzz.

“I feel like he knows that Korean Zombie is not going to do it,” Ortega said of the trash talk. “Which means, if you don’t stir up the pot, it won’t sell. If you don’t sell, [Park] don’t make money. He’s stirring up the pot, so [Jung] could get more attention, so [Park] could get more money. … It left a bitter taste in my mouth.”

Cha said it was his idea for Park to help with the interpreting on the Helwani Show. Park is a well-known musician worldwide and does have a flair for entertainment. But, Cha said, Park didn’t mistranslate anything that Jung had said. Cha said everything Jung writes on social media or says in interviews is Jung’s own words.

“It’s not gonna be a perfect translation any time you translate English to Korean and so forth,” Cha said. “It was literally the same thing. I think [Ortega] thought that [Park] was making him say those things and writing the script, which was totally absurd. I was right there. It wasn’t anything that Jay did. He was sitting there, just translating.”



Jay Park explains why he doesn’t understand Brian Ortega’s confrontation with him at UFC 248.

On March 7, 2020, Jung; his wife, Sun Young; Park; and House were sitting two rows from the cage for UFC 248. As the co-main event fighters entered the Octagon, Ortega made his way over to where Jung’s party was seated. Jung and his wife had stepped away, and Ortega made good on his Instagram promise — he confronted Park and slapped him across the face.

Security separated them and escorted Park to the greenroom backstage, where he met up with Jung, Sun Young, House and Cha. UFC executive vice president and chief business officer Hunter Campbell came into the room to see what was going on. So did Las Vegas Metro Police Department officers. Park was interviewed for an incident report. Jung sat there quietly, seething.

In an angry Instagram post, Jung wrote: “It was not a fight like real men would do. What you have done is same as a grown-up to beat a child. You should have attacked me. If so, I would have not been upset. You are such a coward for slapping a musician not a fighter … Now, your f—ing face stays in my mind and I will f— you up in the cage. I hope you won’t run away from me again.”

View this post on Instagram

My pride is my enemy, and over the last couple days I’ve been battling it. I hope you understand that I’m human and I’m flawed, in more ways than one. In the beginning, I justified my actions based on the series of events that led up to Saturday, but I now realize that what I did was wrong overall. My parents taught me dignity and respect, and I didn’t show that. My coaches have always taught me that martial arts are to empower the weak against the strong. On Saturday, that didn’t happen. _ When I make a mistake, I own the consequences. But in this case the negativity that I’ve caused has spilled over to the people closest to me, and that’s how I know that what I did was truly wrong. I’m sorry to you guys and my family. _ I apologize to @JParkitrighthere for my actions and the shit storm that followed, you deserve to enjoy MMA from outside the octagon just like any other fan. I apologize to @KoreanZombieMMA for dragging your friend into an equation that should start and end with the fighters.

A post shared by Brian Ortega (@briantcity) on Mar 11, 2020 at 2:41pm PDT

Jung’s team demanded Ortega apologize or Park would press charges. Two nights later, Ortega posted on Twitter that he was sorry for slapping the interpreter and the K-pop star but “I don’t apologize for slapping the ‘instigator.'” Ortega later deleted that post and tweeted a more formal apology March 10.

“I don’t want to take this dude’s money,” Park said March 9 on the Helwani Show. “I don’t want him to go to jail or anything like that. I don’t wish anything bad about him. It was just really weird. I don’t know what other way to put it. I don’t know what he was thinking. He needs to get his act together. Real talk.”

Per Las Vegas Metro PD spokesperson Larry Hadfield, Park has a year from the incident date to decide whether to pursue charges against Ortega. Because of that and the potential for a lawsuit, Ortega said he’d rather not speak in detail about what happened.

Ortega understands the backlash, though. What he did to Park seemed the polar opposite of how he has been viewed during his UFC run. Ortega is one of the UFC’s most popular fighters — he’s in Modelo commercials, is active in charities and rubs elbows with the likes of Robert Downey Jr.

“No one expected that from me,” Ortega said. “No one has ever seen that, no one ever expected it, from a media perspective. People who know me, they know me. They understand how I work and how I move. To the media, it’s always: I win, and I have positive things to say. But I’ve also said it in the media — none of these guys have ever tried to piss me off. I don’t have any reason to be mad. The guys I’m fighting are all respectful or they’re not talking s—. Why would I get mad at someone? I’m not gonna get mad unless you poke the bear. Understand? You poked the bear.



Brian Ortega describes the timeline of when he started to want more from his training camp and ulimately why he decided to make a change.

“You want to f—ing be a Chihuahua and walk around a pit bull and start barking loud, don’t be mad if they f—ing nip at you. There’s a reason why [fighters] walk in the room — you can be a celebrity, you can be anyone — when we walk in the room, there’s a certain sign of respect, because they know what we do. There’s no games involved, and it’s real blood, real sweat, real tears and real f—ing physical pain.”

Ortega grew up in San Pedro, California, the hard-scrabble Harbor area of Los Angeles. In a way, Gracie said, the slap was a bit of a reminder that Ortega didn’t have the easiest upbringing.

“There’s definitely a different code of human interaction that Brian was used to growing up,” Gracie said. “Which is why he doesn’t go there. Up until now in his career, we’ve known nothing like this of him. It’s just happy, smiling, super chill, loving his fans, super interactive. But when you provoke him, you get his past and to some degree the core of who he is — not by choice but by circumstances. When you trigger that, you deal with the consequences. There’s no doubt.

“You want Brian on your team. You don’t ever want Brian against you. Because if he’s on your team, he’ll die for you. And if he’s against you, there’s no limit. That’s what it is.”

Jung’s team, though, saw it differently.

“[Park] isn’t a fighter,” Cha said. “He’s a pop star, he’s a rapper. He’s a businessman. He’s 130-something pounds. It’s just a bully move. It’s like a reporter, if you translate something and a No. 3 fighter in the world goes and hits you, that’s some punk s—.”

On March 11, Ortega posted a more robust apology on Instagram, writing that “I now realize that what I did was wrong overall.” Jung accepted the apology in his own post and said he was also sorry.

“It’s not about Jay or anything else. [Jung is] just focused on Brian. He knows what’s at stake. He’s never once brought that up, used it as fuel or anything else. It’s already motivation enough to win when you get in the top five and there’s a potential title shot [on the line].” Eddie Cha
Chan Jung Sung’s Korean American coach

“I too, apologize for trash talking,” Jung wrote. “I thought my fans were enjoying it but what happened taught me to be more careful. Also, I realized this was not the person that I really am. We have only one more thing left between us and that is the fight. I will fight you and I will beat you, I really will.”

Ortega said he definitely has regrets about how things transpired.

“One hundred percent I wish it played out differently,” Ortega said. “I didn’t want this. I always try to have a good rep in the UFC. I always wanted a good name for myself, and I didn’t want to mess it up. I have a good record with the UFC and these guys. I’ve been doing good, I’ve been on good behavior.

“We all need reminders in life. ‘You’re acting this way, you’re doing that.’ That was just a reminder that I cannot act the way I used to act. Like, ‘Brian, you can’t just be going around and slapping people and doing s— like that and checking people.’ You’re getting to a spot where you’re being recognized. People look up to you whether you like it or not. You’re a role model to people, whether you like it or not.”

Jung and Park are also ready to move forward. Park declined to be interviewed for this piece and will not be in Abu Dhabi this week, Cha said, because he wants the focus to be on Jung.

“Now, it’s all business,” Cha said of Jung. “We’re focused on the fight. It’s not about Jay or anything else. [Jung is] just focused on Brian. He just wants to go out there and compete. He knows what’s at stake. He’s a professional. He’s never once brought that up, used it as fuel or anything else. It’s already motivation enough to win when you get in the top five and there’s a potential title shot [on the line].”

ESPN has Ortega ranked No. 3 and Jung at No. 8 in its featherweight rankings.

The stakes are very high, and the bad blood might be on the back burner, which is kind of ironic, considering the real violence is about to commence.


Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


What Kind Of Supreme Court Justice Will Amy Coney Barrett Be? 



It’s official: Amy Coney Barrett will be the country’s next Supreme Court justice. She was confirmed by a 52 to 48 vote margin, and will be sworn in by Justice Clarence Thomas at the White House tonight — just in time for Election Day.

Barrett’s ascension to the court was incredibly swift — her confirmation hearings started less than a month after Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death, and this is the closest to an election a Supreme Court confirmation vote has been held. Notably, though, despite this accelerated timeline, Barrett emerged relatively unscathed from her confirmation hearings. This is quite a feat considering both the partisan nature of the hearings and the looming questions over whether the rush to confirm her jeopardizes the court’s legitimacy.

Barrett’s confirmation is incredibly consequential, too, as she will likely shift the center of gravity away from Chief Justice John Roberts and toward the right edge of the court’s conservative wing, which could potentially result in rulings that are significantly outside the mainstream of public opinion.

We won’t have to wait long to see how Barrett rules, either. She faces a slew of hot-button cases right off the bat, including a dispute over religious liberty exemptions, a challenge to the Affordable Care Act and several cases involving controversial Trump administration policies — not to mention any election-related fights that make their way to the court in the next few weeks, plus the fact that Mississippi recently asked the Supreme Court to consider its 15-week abortion ban, which directly challenges Roe v. Wade.

Why Barrett is poised to remake the Supreme Court

As we’ve written before, it’s hard to know exactly how a nominee to the Supreme Court will rule until they’re actually sworn in and begin weighing in on cases. But we do have data on Barrett’s three years as a judge on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and as you can see in the chart below, she was very conservative.

We looked at two separate analyses of her record on the court this month, and we found whether it was in regular opinions or in special en banc decisions in which the entire appeals court ruled together, she was consistently on the right-most edge — if not the most conservative judge on the bench. And she was especially likely to rule in a conservative direction on civil rights issues.

Those findings underscore the idea that Barrett is likely to be a reliable conservative vote on the court. And her confirmation is even more significant because she’s replacing one of the court’s stalwart liberals. If Barrett ends up being ideologically similar to Justice Samuel Alito, who is currently the second-most conservative justice on the Supreme Court, her replacement of Ginsburg could be one of the biggest ideological swings in modern court history.

In this scenario, Justice Brett Kavanaugh would replace Roberts as the court’s new median justice, which could lead to a significant rightward turn on the court, as Roberts is often the lone conservative justice to side with the liberals. He has cast several recent pivotal votes with the liberals, too, including a dispute in which the justices deadlocked 4-4 on whether to halt a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision that allowed state officials to count ballots that arrive up to three days late. With Barrett on the court, though, Roberts would lose that “swing justice” role.

In the short term, that means election-related cases could have very different outcomes — even including a new iteration of the Pennsylvania case, which Republican officials recently brought back to the court. And in the long term, conservative legal advocates may respond by bringing even more ambitious cases, questioning long-held precedents.

The hearings could have gone much worse for Barrett — and the court

The idea of confirming anyone to replace Ginsburg before the election was quite unpopular only a few weeks ago. While it’s true that most Supreme Court confirmation hearings are pretty partisan these days, around the time Barrett was named as the nominee, a majority of Americans said they wanted the winner of the election to choose the next justice. And polling by the Economist in mid-October also found that Barrett was the most unpopular nominee in Supreme Court history.

Now, though, Americans may actually have warmed to the idea of Barrett joining the court before Election Day. According to tracking polls by Morning Consult, support for confirming Barrett rose from 37 percent when she was nominated to 51 percent after the hearings were over and a Gallup poll conducted during Barrett’s confirmation hearings found a similar result. Notably, according to that Gallup poll, this was substantially higher than the share who wanted the Senate to confirm Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 (41 percent), and is even slightly higher than the support previous nominees since 1987 have received on average (48 percent).

Barrett’s confirmation wasn’t that divisive

Share of Americans who said they were or were not in favor of the Senate confirming each Supreme Court nominee

Nominee In favor Not in favor No opinion
Amy Coney Barrett 51% 46% 3%
Brett Kavanaugh 41 37 22
Neil Gorsuch 45 32 23
Merrick Garland 52 29 19
Elena Kagan 46 32 22
Sonia Sotomayor 54 28 19
Samuel Alito 50 25 25
Harriet Miers 44 36 20
John Roberts 59 22 19
Ruth Bader Ginsburg 53 14 33
Clarence Thomas 52 17 31
Robert Bork 31 25 44
Average for previous nominees 48 27 25

Data was not available for Justices Stephen Breyer, David Souter, Anthony Kennedy and Douglas Ginsburg.

Source: Gallup

To be sure, this isn’t universal support for Barrett’s confirmation. Partisan opinion on her confirmation is really divided — according to Gallup, only 15 percent of Democrats wanted the Senate to vote to confirm her, for instance. A deep partisan divide in support isn’t a good sign for the court in general either, as it can reinforce perceptions that the court is itself a partisan institution. But Barrett could have emerged a lot less popular from her hearing — which is why the level of support she does enjoy is pretty notable, especially when you consider most Americans agreed that she’d push the court to the right (54 percent in that Morning Consult poll).

Barrett will be faced with highly controversial cases immediately

Barrett could be immediately faced with tough decisions, too, including voting on the fate of ballot deadlines in several states. There are a number of important or even precedent-altering cases at stake, too, and considering that the Roberts court has already been overturning more precedents with slim 5-4 majorities than any other court in modern history, that trend could further accelerate with Barrett on the court.

The day after the election, for instance, the justices will hear a case in which they’re being asked to reconsider a 30-year-old religious liberty precedent. In that case, the justices will consider whether that precedent makes it too hard for religious people to sue for exemptions. The majority opinion in that precedent-setting case, Employment Division v. Smith, was actually written by the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, but four of the current conservative justices have already signaled they may be willing to strike it down. Barrett could overrule it, and make it much easier for nondiscrimination provisions to be challenged by religious litigants.

fAnd a week after the election, a case involving the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act will come before the court, in which the justices could declare the entire law invalid. Another important signal will be whether Barrett’s presence on the court gives conservatives a fourth vote to hear a case involving Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, which the state attorney general described as an “ideal vehicle” for “clarifying” how the court’s precedents on abortion should be interpreted. There are also several important Trump administration policies on the docket a little later this term — including the administration’s attempt to exclude undocumented citizens from the census count used for redistricting, and whether Trump unconstitutionally commandeered Congress’s power when he diverted Defense Department funds to expand the border wall with Mexico. Given that several recent Supreme Court decisions on Trump administration policies — including an attempt to add a question about citizenship to the 2020 census — split 5-4, with Roberts casting a deciding vote with the liberals against the Trump administration, Barrett’s presence on the court could make a decision in favor of Trump more likely.1

Barrett made it through her confirmation hearings mostly without controversy, but we’ll see whether that lasts. It won’t take long to get a sense for just how far the Supreme Court’s conservatives are willing to go now that they hold a decisive majority for the first time in decades.


Continue Reading


Cowboys DC feels heat after hot sauce mishap



FRISCO, Texas — When the Dallas Cowboys practice Wednesday, defensive coordinator Mike Nolan might be on the injury report. The reason? Tabasco.

Nolan had to step away from his weekly conference call with reporters on Monday because he got some hot sauce in his eye in the middle of answering a question about the effectiveness of pass-rusher DeMarcus Lawrence.

“He’s been active every week as far as, I think, disrupting the quarterback. He’s escaped several times to do that,” Nolan said. “Obviously, the frustration for him as well is — look, it’s when he misses them. Whoop, excuse me. I’ve got something in my eye. Just had some Tabasco on my finger, and it went in my eye. That wasn’t good. Ugh. Terrible, geez. I’m sorry.”

It has been that kind of season for Nolan.

The Cowboys are on pace to allow 555 points this season. They have given up 243 points so far, which is more than they have given up in 11 seasons in franchise history, not counting the strike season in 1982, and equal to what they allowed in 1992.

Nolan was able to clean out his eye and return to the news conference.

“My eye feels a lot better,” he said, “but it was burning.”


Continue Reading


Surprise! October Surprises Don’t Usually Decide Elections



In this installment of the FiveThirtyEight Politics podcast, the crew discusses the October surprises we’ve seen so far this year and the likelihood of another late development shaking up the race for president. The gang also answers more listener questions.


Continue Reading