Taking too long? Close loading screen.
Connect with us


Chrissy Teigen & John Legend: See Inside The $24 Million Mansion They’re Selling As They Await Baby No. 3



Chrissy Teigen and John Legend are parting ways with their beloved Beverly Hills mansion, asking $24 million as they look for a bigger home for their soon to be family of five.

Fans of Chrissy Teigen, 34, and John Legend , 41, have come to intimately know their Beverly Hills home through the couple’s prolific social media posts (especially their beloved chef’s kitchen). But with the cookware designer pregnant with their third child, the pair has put the home on the market for a whopping $24 million as they search for a place with more space. They’ll be looking to make a hefty profit after purchasing the home, once owned by Rihanna, for $14.1 million in 2016.

John Legend house
The backside of John Legend and Chrissy Teigen’s 8,500 sq. ft. Beverly Hills mansion. The kitchen and living room both open up into outdoor lounging areas next to the pool Photo credit: SplashNews

EGOT winner John personally had a major role in the stylish decor of the 8,500 square foot home, which features 7 bedrooms, 8 bathrooms. While that might seem like plenty of space, Chrissy’s mom Vilailuck Teigen, lives with the couple and helps care for their daughter Luna, four, and son Miles, two, in addition to starring in cooking videos for Chrissy’s Cravings website. The kids have their own rooms, the new baby will have his or her own nursery, and that means a bigger home is in order.

Chrissy Teigen and John Legend
Chrissy Teigen and John Legend look dressed to the nines as they head out in New York City on May 29 2019. Photo credit: SplashNews

Fans already have seen the house’s incredible chef’s kitchen with it’s custom appliances and giant eat-in island where Chrissy has served up many creative meals. The home’s open floor plan opens up into an airy two-story neighboring living room, with a wall featuring a see-through linear fireplace. IG followers are greatly familiar with the large family area, featuring plenty of comfy sofas. Less familiar is the gorgeous formal dining room on the other side of the wall from where Chrissy tucks in to watch all of her Real Housewives shows.

John Legend house
The open two-story music area with John’s wall of awards, and the couple’s living room behind it. Photo credit: SplashNews.

Areas of the home that the couple are less showy about include a gorgeous ceiling covered with intricate mandala-patterns from Thailand, and “redone cerused oak floors, and steel-rolled walls that ‘exude sensuality,’ per marketing materials obtained by our sister site Dirt.com The site adds that John and Chrissy share a “warehouse-sized master bedroom with a one-of-a-kind brass and concrete fireplace” and “his-and-hers showroom closets,” with Chrissy’s being enviably large for her amazing wardrobe. She’s actually shown it off in many Instagram videos while modeling her incredible clothing and robe collecitions and it is HUGE. Whoever owns this home next is hopefully a major clothes horse.

John Legend house
John Legend and Chrissy Teigen’s entryway, featuring a staircase to the couple’s master bedroom living area and mandala patters on the ceiling. Photo credit: SplashNews

The home also comes with the typical A-list amenities such as a a large home gym, movie theater with soundproof walls, home office, and a plunge pool. There’s also backyard green space, where John famously built Luna’s first play “restaurant.” Fans have watched the couple raise their precious family in the home, so we can’t imagine how hard it must be for John and Chrissy to part with it, Especially with all of the memories they made there as a young family (Luna’s first big-girl bedroom anyone?).

John and Chrissy just bought a $5.1 million modern contemporary home nearby in West Hollywood in April. It has now turned into Chrissy’s Cravings headquarters for photo shoots, cooking demonstrations and other needs that go along with her culinary empire, so that the couple’s main house can go back to being more of a family home. Though whatever new home they purchase, the living area will surely be shown in many Instagram videos of Chrissy watching her beloved Bravo shows on a big screen TV, or making the family dinners and super fun desserts in the new place’s kitchen.

Source : Hollywood Life Read More

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Netflix is developing a live action ‘Assassin’s Creed’ show



Netflix announced this morning that it’s partnering with Ubisoft to adapt the game publisher’s “Assassin’s Creed” franchise into a live action series.

The franchise jumps around in history, telling the story of a secret society of assassins with “genetic memory” and their centuries-long battle the knights templar. It has sold 155 million games worldwide and was also turned into a nearly incomprehensible 2016 film starring Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard, which underperformed at the box office.

The companies say that they’re currently looking for a showrunner. Jason Altman and Danielle Kreinik of Ubisoft’s film and television division will serve as executive producers. (In addition to working on adaptations of Ubisoft’s intellectual property, the publisher is also involved in the Apple TV+ industry comedy “Mythic Quest.”)

“We’re excited to partner with Ubisoft and bring to life the rich, multilayered storytelling that Assassin’s Creed is beloved for,” said Netflix’s vice president of original series Peter Friedlander in a statement. “From its breathtaking historical worlds and massive global appeal as one of the best selling video game franchises of all time, we are committed to carefully crafting epic and thrilling entertainment based on this distinct IP and provide a deeper dive for fans and our members around the world to enjoy.”

It sounds like there could be follow-up shows as well, with the announcement saying that Netflix and Ubisoft will “tap into the iconic video game’s trove of dynamic stories with global mass appeal for adaptations of live action, animated, and anime series.”

Netflix recently placed an eight-episode order for “Resident Evil,” another video game franchise that was previously adapted for the big screen. And it also had a big hit with its adaptation of “The Witcher,” which is based on a fantasy book series that was popularized via video games.


Continue Reading


Original Content podcast: ‘Lovecraft Country’ is gloriously bonkers



As we tried to recap the first season of HBO’s “Lovecraft Country,” one thing became clear: The show is pretty nuts.

The story begins by sending Atticus “Tic” Freeman (Jonathan Majors), his friend Leti Lewis (Jurnee Smolett) and his uncle George (Courtney B. Vance) on a road trip across mid-’50s America in search of Tic’s missing father. You might assume that the search will occupy the entire season, or take even longer than that; instead, the initial storyline is wrapped up quickly.

And while there’s a story running through the whole season, most of the episodes are relatively self-contained, offering their own versions on various horror and science fiction tropes. There’s a haunted house episode, an Indiana Jones episode, a time travel episode and more.

The show isn’t perfect — the writing can be clunky, the special effects cheesy and cheap-looking. But at its best, it does an impressive job of mixing increasingly outlandish plots, creepy monsters (with plentiful gore) and a healthy dose of politics.

After all, “Lovecraft Country” (adapted form a book by Matt Ruff) is named after notoriously racist horror writer H.P. Lovecraft, but it focuses almost entirely on Black characters, making the case that old genres can be reinvigorated with diverse casts and a rethinking of political assumptions.

In addition to reviewing the show, the latest episode of the Original Content podcast also includes a discussion of Netflix earnings, the new season of “The Bachelorette” and the end of Quibi.

You can listen in the player below, subscribe using Apple Podcasts or find us in your podcast player of choice. If you like the show, please let us know by leaving a review on Apple. You can also follow us on Twitter or send us feedback directly. (Or suggest shows and movies for us to review!)

And if you’d like to skip ahead, here’s how the episode breaks down:
0:00 Intro
0:36 Netflix discussion
3:18 “The Bachelorette”
6:30 Quibi
14:35 “Lovecraft Country” review
31:32 “Lovecraft Country” spoiler discussion


Continue Reading


The short, strange life of Quibi



“All that is left now is to offer a profound apology for disappointing you and, ultimately, for letting you down,” Jeffrey Katzenberg and Meg Whitman wrote, closing out an open letter posted to Medium. “We cannot thank you enough for being there with us, and for us, every step of the way.”

With that, the founding executives confirmed the rumors and put Quibi to bed, a little more than six months after launching the service.

Starting a business is an impossibly difficult task under nearly any conditions, but even in a world that’s littered with high-profile failures, the streaming service’s swan song was remarkable for both its dramatically brief lifespan and the amount of money the company managed to raise (and spend) during that time.

A month ahead of its commercial launch, Quibi announced that it had raised another $750 million. That second round of funding brought the yet-to-launch streaming service’s funding up to $1.75 billion — roughly the same as the gross domestic product of Belize, give or take $100 million.

“We concluded a very successful second raise which will provide Quibi with a strong cash runway,” CFO Ambereen Toubassy told the press at the time. “This round of $750 million gives us tremendous flexibility and the financial wherewithal to build content and technology that consumers embrace.”

Quibi’s second funding round brought the yet-to-launch streaming service’s funding up to $1.75 billion — roughly the same as the gross domestic product of Belize, give or take $100 million.

From a financial perspective, Quibi had reason to be hopeful. Its fundraising ambitions were matched only by the aggressiveness with which it planned to spend that money. At the beginning of the year, Whitman touted the company’s plans to spend up to $100,000 per minute of programming — $6 million per hour. The executive proudly contrasted the jaw-dropping sum to the estimated $500 to $5,000 an hour spent by YouTube creators.

For Whitman and Katzenberg — best known for their respective reigns at HP and Disney — money was key to success in an already crowded marketplace. $1 billion was a drop in the bucket compared to the $17.3 billion Netflix was expected to spend on original content in 2020, but it was a start.

Following in the footsteps of Apple, who had also recently announced plans to spend $1 billion to launch its own fledgling streaming service, the company was enlisting A-List talent, from Steven Spielberg, Guillermo del Toro and Ridley Scott to Reese Witherspoon, Jennifer Lopez and LeBron James. If your name carried any sort of clout in Hollywood boardrooms, Quibi would happily cut you a check, seemingly regardless of content specifics.

Quibi’s strategy primarily defined itself by itself by its constraints. In hopes of attracting younger millennial and Gen Z, the company’s content would be not just mobile-first, but mobile-only. There would be no smart TV app, no Chromecast or AirPlay compatibility. Pricing, while low compared to the competition, was similarly off-putting. After a 90-day free trial, $4.99 got you an ad-supported subscription. And boy howdy, were there ads. Ads upon ads. Ads all the way down. Paying another $3 a month would make them go away.

Technological constraints and Terms of Service fine print forbade screen shots — a fundamental understanding of how content goes viral in 2020 (though, to be fair, one shared with other competing streaming services). Amusingly, the inability to share content led to videos like this one of director Sam Raimi’s perplexingly earnest “The Golden Arm.”

It features a built-on laugh track from viewers as Emmy winner Rachel Brosnahan lies in a hospital bed after refusing to remove a golden prosthetic. It’s an allegory, surely, but not one intentionally played for laughs. Many of the videos that did ultimately make the rounds on social media were regarded as a curiosity — strange artifacts from a nascent streaming service that made little sense on paper.

Most notable of all, however, were the “quick bites” that gave the service its confusingly pronounced name. Each program would be served in 5-10 minute chunks. The list included films acquired by the service, sliced up into “chapters.” Notably, the service didn’t actually purchase the content outright; instead, rights were set to revert to their creators after seven years. Meanwhile, after two years, content partners were able to “reassemble” the chunks back into a movie for distribution.


Continue Reading