Taking too long? Close loading screen.
Connect with us

Science

A future with tens of thousands of new satellites could ‘fundamentally change’ astronomy: report

Published

on

In the future, as astronomers make observations of the night sky, they might see more and more satellites pass overhead that ruin their work — and this problem is likely to get a lot worse, according to a new report from a working group of astronomers. As space companies continue to inject tens of thousands of new satellites into low orbits around Earth, the new additions could “fundamentally change” astronomical observations of the night sky and the Universe.

To dampen the effects of these giant constellations as much as possible, the group is proposing 10 recommendations to mitigate satellite influence on astronomy. But if upward of 100,000 satellites are added to Earth orbit, as many companies have proposed, there’s no way to completely erase their effects. “The main takeaway from our findings is that no combination of mitigations will eliminate the impact of satellite constellations on optical astronomy,” Connie Walker, an astronomer at NOIRLab in Tucson, Arizona and a collaborator on the report, said during a press conference detailing the findings.

Numerous companies such as SpaceX, Amazon, OneWeb, and more have proposed launching thousands of satellites into medium to low orbits above Earth in order to provide broadband internet access to the ground below. These constellations are supposed to beam coverage to all parts of the globe, which is why companies want them to be so massive in size; that way, at least one satellite is over any given area at all times. SpaceX has permission from the FCC to launch nearly 12,000 satellites above Earth, while Amazon just received approval to launch 3,236 satellites. OneWeb, which recently went bankrupt and changed ownership, had planned to put up 650 satellites before its financial troubles. However, some companies are eyeing substantial additions to their constellations; SpaceX has indicated its desire to launch an additional 30,000 satellites on top of the initial 12,000, while OneWeb sought permission to launch 48,000 satellites even amid its bankruptcy woes.

Astronomers have grown increasingly concerned about all these proposed constellations, fearing these spacecraft could meddle with future observations of the Universe. Whenever bright satellites pass over an observatory, they can leave white streaks across an image, ruining planned observations of the cosmos. Plus, the satellites that SpaceX have been putting up already have been particularly bright because of their altitudes in the sky and how they’re designed. For instance, their antennae are particularly shiny and effective at reflecting light from the sky, even at night. “You know satellites have been visible since the dawn of the space age,” Ralph Gaume, director of the division of astronomical sciences at the National Science Foundation, said during the press conference. “But something has changed recently, and was recognized about a year ago, when large numbers of satellites began launching and began being visible in our nighttime sky.”

Some studies have tried to quantify just how afraid astronomers should be, and now this new report, written by a group of astronomers who convened this summer for the first Satellite Constellations 1 workshop, has been put together to figure that out. They worked with representatives from SpaceX, Amazon, and OneWeb on the project, ultimately coming up with a comprehensive guide for what astronomy will look like with a future of tens of thousands of new satellites. The report says that the effects of these constellations on both astronomy and the human experience range “from negligible to extreme.” The report confirmed that the satellites will be the most visible around twilight hours, when the sky is dark but when the Sun can still reflect off of the surface of the spacecraft. But if some constellations are fully realized, such as OneWeb’s nearly 50,000-satellite network, it could mean that some observations will always have to deal with satellites in their images.

[embedded content]

“If a large constellation like OneWeb — 47,000 satellites at 1,200 kilometers — is launched, every 32nd exposure will have at least one satellite trail,” Patrick Seitzer, a professor of astronomy at the University of Michigan, said, explaining observations of the Large Magellanic Cloud, the largest satellite galaxy in our own Milky Way galaxy. “No matter the time of night, during the summer in the southern hemisphere, we’ll have at least one satellite trail. And that is a great challenge for astronomy.”

The report details a list of recommendations for both observatories and satellite operators, so that mega-constellations and astronomers can live in something close to harmony. The biggest thing that observatories can do is improve their software tools and algorithms to help digitally remove satellite streaks from images; software can also help predict when and where these satellites will be at certain times, possibly allowing astronomers to avoid them when doing observations of the night sky.

As for the satellite operators, the astronomy group proposed a number of changes and tweaks that can be made to satellite design. One crucial recommendation is designing the satellites so that they are as dark as possible. SpaceX, for one, has been experimenting with various ways to dampen the reflectivity of its satellites, by first coating one satellite and then adding a visor to others. Some astronomers have been able to measure how the coating worked, but it’s been hard to observe the ones with visors because of the pandemic. “We’re a little bit hampered by the fact that many telescopes are still shut down due to the pandemic,” said Lori Allen, the acting director of the National Optical Astronomy Observatory. “And so not as many apertures are available on the skies we normally have, but we are working on that.”

Another big recommendation is adjusting the orbital height of the satellites. Astronomers are particularly concerned about satellites that will orbit above 600 kilometers, as they’ll be visible in the sky for longer periods of time. “The takeaway for the 600 kilometer limit is that the higher altitude ones are much more dangerous,” said Seitzer. SpaceX’s satellites will orbit lower than this limit, but OneWeb’s proposed constellation would orbit much higher than that. Astronomers also gave recommendations about how satellite operators can adjust the heights of their satellites in order to minimize flares on the ground.

Above all, the group believes that both satellite operators and astronomers should work together to organize an observational campaign of all these satellites to really determine just how much they’ll impact astronomy. As satellite operators tweak their vehicles, astronomers will need to measure these updates to see if they’re actually working. Plus, the more observations of these satellites, the better astronomers can predict where they’ll be and how they’ll affect an image. “This requires multiple measurements of the satellite brightnesses at a wide range of deployment stages and illumination angles,” Allen said. “And so we need multiple observatory sites and multiple telescopes engaged in this process.”

Ultimately, there’s still a lot of work to be done by both astronomers and operators alike as these mega-constellations get fleshed out. In the years ahead, many operators will fail to put all of these satellites up, as numerous companies have tried and failed in the past to create massive constellations to provide broadband. However, it’s best to be prepared, since companies are eager to get a piece of this internet-from-space market. Perhaps the biggest way to mitigate risk to astronomy is for all these satellite launches to stop, but astronomers know that won’t be the case. “Not launching satellite constellations — while this may be an option, it’s not viable for industry,” Walker said.

Source : TheVerge ScienceRead More

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Science

Too bright to breed

Published

on

Night light from coastal cities overpowers natural signals for coral spawning from neighboring reefs.

PHOTO: NOKURO/ALAMY STOCK PHOTO

Most coral species reproduce through broadcast spawning. For such a strategy to be successful, coordination has had to evolve such that gametes across clones are released simultaneously. Over millennia, lunar cycles have facilitated this coordination, but the recent development of bright artificial light has led to an overpowering of these natural signals. Ayalon et al. tested for the direct impact of different kinds of artificial light on different species of corals. The authors found that multiple lighting types, including cold and warm light-emitting diode (LED) lamps, led to loss of synchrony and spawning failure. Further, coastal maps of artificial lighting globally suggest that it threatens to interfere with coral reproduction worldwide and that the deployment of LED lights, the blue light of which penetrates deeper into the water column, is likely to make the situation even worse.

Curr. Biol. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.039 (2020).

Source

Continue Reading

Science

SpaceX launches Starlink app and provides pricing and service info to early beta testers

Published

on

SpaceX has debuted an official app for its Starlink satellite broadband internet service, for both iOS and Android devices. The Starlink app allows users to manage their connection – but to take part you’ll have to be part of the official beta program, and the initial public rollout of that is only just about to begin, according to emails SpaceX sent to potential beta testers this week.

The Starlink app provides guidance on how to install the Starlink receiver dish, as well as connection status (including signal quality), a device overview for seeing what’s connected to your network, and a speed test tool. It’s similar to other mobile apps for managing home wifi connections and routers. Meanwhile, the emails to potential testers that CNBC obtained detail what users can expect in terms of pricing, speeds and latency.

The initial Starlink public beta test is called the “Better than Nothing Beta Program,” SpaceX confirms in their app description, and will be rolled out across the U.S. and Canada before the end of the year – which matches up with earlier stated timelines. As per the name, SpaceX is hoping to set expectations for early customers, with speeds users can expect ranging from between 50Mb/s to 150Mb/s, and latency of 20ms to 40ms according to the customer emails, with some periods including no connectivity at all. Even with expectations set low, if those values prove accurate, it should be a big improvement for users in some hard-to-reach areas where service is currently costly, unreliable and operating at roughly dial-up equivalent speeds.

Image Credits: SpaceX

In terms of pricing, SpaceX says in the emails that the cost for participants in this beta program will be $99 per moth, plus a one-time cost of $499 initially to pay for the hardware, which includes the mounting kit and receiver dish, as well as a router with wifi networking capabilities.

The goal eventually is offer reliably, low-latency broadband that provides consistent connection by handing off connectivity between a large constellation of small satellites circling the globe in low Earth orbit. Already, SpaceX has nearly 1,000 of those launched, but it hopes to launch many thousands more before it reaches global coverage and offers general availability of its services.

SpaceX has already announced some initial commercial partnerships and pilot programs for Starlink, too, including a team-up with Microsoft to connect that company’s mobile Azure data centers, and a project with an East Texas school board to connect the local community.

Source

Continue Reading

Science

Erratum for the Report “Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances” by R. Van Klink, D. E. Bowler, K. B. Gongalsky, A. B. Swengel, A. Gentile, J. M. Chase

Published

on

S. Rennie, J. Adamson, R. Anderson, C. Andrews, J. Bater, N. Bayfield, K. Beaton, D. Beaumont, S. Benham, V. Bowmaker, C. Britt, R. Brooker, D. Brooks, J. Brunt, G. Common, R. Cooper, S. Corbett, N. Critchley, P. Dennis, J. Dick, B. Dodd, N. Dodd, N. Donovan, J. Easter, M. Flexen, A. Gardiner, D. Hamilton, P. Hargreaves, M. Hatton-Ellis, M. Howe, J. Kahl, M. Lane, S. Langan, D. Lloyd, B. McCarney, Y. McElarney, C. McKenna, S. McMillan, F. Milne, L. Milne, M. Morecroft, M. Murphy, A. Nelson, H. Nicholson, D. Pallett, D. Parry, I. Pearce, G. Pozsgai, A. Riley, R. Rose, S. Schafer, T. Scott, L. Sherrin, C. Shortall, R. Smith, P. Smith, R. Tait, C. Taylor, M. Taylor, M. Thurlow, A. Turner, K. Tyson, H. Watson, M. Whittaker, I. Woiwod, C. Wood, UK Environmental Change Network (ECN) Moth Data: 1992-2015, NERC Environmental Information Data Centre (2018); .

Source

Continue Reading

Trending